HitManStanners (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

shouldn't smoke... bad image

dailylente9 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I wanna marry similar 'individual' to this one in the video.

jarl11 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I can do an even shorter one: (presocrates), bla bla bla bla bla bla bla, plato aristotle, augustin,(christianity), bla bla bla bla bla Kant bla bla bla bla Nietzsche,marx,Kirkegaard (im danish) bla bla, heidegger, bla bla bla bla..

gavbag1234 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

But does that make it a lie just because you dont get it? I'm sure you haven't got a knife in your face but you wouldn't see someone who did and say they we're lying about it.You should start looking in different places for happiness then. Im sure as soon as you can know its out there you will be more able to find it. I also hope you do I dont like the idea that someone isnt happy.Look forward man and work to believe in that sort of stuff. Sorry I cant help

minor7b5natural9 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I think it all depends on how you define happiness and sadness. If happiness is a feeling of contentment, then I never get it, so it doesn't exist in my experience.

gavbag1234 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Unless you can differenciate this from sadness then one must apply this notion to sadness. And so we are led to the point of which is less a lie? Which is the better lie?

minor7b5natural9 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

happiness is a lie

flye222 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

well to a person who likes to philsosiphys heres something.. its impossible to get all thoughts and emotions on paper or explaint o someone at that instant exactly how u feel or what ur feeling.. anywa im trippen balls and thats my thoughts on philosphy now im going and ill see u later have fun peac i dont give a fuck.. but will excell what ever u fuckers think because that is what i want and i do it so why am i sitting here.. rite.. do it

polpoint (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

You're cool - you made me laugh out loud while listening to this at work.

10mintwo (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Well 'm afraid that is complete tosh. Just because you cracked Stephen Hawking's Universe one time about decade ago doesn't mean you know what the fuck you're talking about when you name drop Schrodinger. The precision with which wave equations can be used to predict nuclear structure and energy levels is nothing short of stunning. Sorry, you fail it. better luck next time with your dimestore philosophical potshots. bye